CRITERION II - TEACHING LEARNING AND EVALUATION

• 2.1 – Student Enrollment and Profile

  • 2.1.1 – Enrollment number of students admitted during the year
  • 2.1.1.1 – Number of students admitted during the year
  • 2.1.1.2 - Number of sanctioned seats during the year
  • 2.1.2 Number of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the year (exclusive of supernumerary seats)
  • 2.1.2.1 - Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories during the year

• 2.2 - Catering to Student Diversity

  • 2.2.1 - The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners
  • 2.2.2 - Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)

• 2.3 - Teaching- Learning Process

  • 2.3.1 - Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
  • 2.3.2 - Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. Write description in maximum of 200 words.
  • 2.3.3 - Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year)
  • 2.3.3.1 - Number of mentors

• 2.4 - Teacher Profile and Quality

  • 2.4.1 - Number of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year
  • 2.4.2 - Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year (consider only highest degree for count)
  • 2.4.2.1 - Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /D.N.C Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year
  • 2.4.3 - Number of years of teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year)
  • 2.4.3.1 - Total experience of full-time teachers

• 2.5 - Evaluation Process and Reforms

  • 2.5.1 - Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode. Write description within 200 words.
  • 2.5.2 - Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient

• 2.6 - Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

  • 2.6.1 - Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students.
  • 2.6.2 - Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.
  • 2.6.3 - Pass percentage of Students during the year
  • 2.6.3.1 - Total number of final year students who passed the university examination during the year.
  • 2.6.3.2 - Total number of final year students who appeared for the university examination during the year.

• 2.7 - Student Satisfaction Survey

  • 2.7.1 - Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) on overall institutional performance (Institution may design its own questionnaire) (results and details need to be provided as a weblink)